Recently, much as the Grinch, I have been puzzling so much that my
puzzler is sore. Folks like the Ricks
Santorum and Perry, Michelle Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, and others have made a
big deal out of the “life begins at conception” premise. I must note that this hypothesis is a social
conservative, Christian construct, quite often accompanied by a corresponding claim
that it is also at this self-same moment of conception that a soul attaches to the
new physical being, making them the property of the Christian god for eternity.
The two beliefs are inseparable.
Interesting, but puzzling. For
the time being let us accept as fact both claims, and examine the consequences
of so doing.
As to the first premise, if life truly begins at conception, the
Christian god becomes at once a prolific abortionist. From the blastocyst through the early fetal
stages, somewhere between forty and fifty percent of all pregnancies will
spontaneously abort. Is that new life not
important to their god? Is he somehow so
utterly incompetent that he screws up fully half of his creations? Or is it simply that he likes his mini-unborns
scrambled for breakfast? Tongue in cheek
perhaps, but a question no “pro-life” warrior has ever bothered answer, nor
even ponder I suspect.
Why do the believing families of spontaneously-aborted “children” not
hold funeral services for their dearly-departed, with match-box sized coffins
and burials in the family plot? I am not
being flippant here; merely inquisitive.
The second claim is even more mind-numbing.
I will ignore the obvious – that “souls” have neither biblical basis, nor
any scientific evidence for their existence – and confine myself to the rather
confusing logistics of soulhood itself.
The claim is that at conception a soul appears; from whence is
unclear. Is a new soul created from thin
air at the time the sperm penetrates the ovum?
Is there a (heavenly?) pool of souls waiting to swoop in, much as a
spouse in a cell-phone lot at a busy airport?
Are they assigned to particular blastocysts based on some set criteria, or
is it first come, first served?
Are souls provided to the spawn of Hindus, Muslims, non-believers and
the like, or is the supply limited only to Christians?
As to the aforementioned rate of spontaneously-aborted conceptions,
what becomes of those souls? Do they
head back to the waiting area and get in line to be reassigned, do they evaporate
into thin air, or are they immediately ushered into heaven to spend eternity
praising the cantankerous Yahweh without ever having the opportunity to spend
at least a short time enjoying normal existence?
Those who bother to think about these things can in all likelihood offer
additional questions, consequences, and inconsistencies to my lists. Those who believe in these things, having
never bothered to question them before, cannot in all honesty be expected to
begin now.
If believers in and advocates for such theses wish to enshrine them in
law however, shouldn’t they be forced to confront these and similar questions
and offer plausible answers before the entire nation is forced to worship at
their alter?
Just asking. Now I need to go
rub my puzzler with some dry ice.
This seems similar to some of my past ponderings. Pay particular attention (if you care to go read) to the last half.
ReplyDelete