The above headline, from an Associated Press article, is a couple of years old now.
I do not normally read such stories because I am opposed to
the Death Penalty for a number of reasons. But that is not the
point today. The story continued:
“LUCASVILLE, Ohio - Ohio executed a religious cult leader Tuesday for
murdering a family of five followers who were taken one at a time to a barn,
bound and shot to death. The youngest was a girl just 7 years old.
Jeffrey Lundgren, 56, died by injection at the Southern Ohio
Correctional Facility. ‘I profess my love for God, my family, for my children,
for Kathy (his wife). I am because you are,’ Lundgren said in his final
statement.
The evidence against him in the deaths of the Avery family — Dennis, 49,
Cheryl, 46, Trina, 15, Rebecca, 13, and 7-year-old Karen — was compelling.
Upset by what he saw as a lack of faith, Lundgren arranged a dinner
hosted by cult members. Afterward, he and his followers led the family members
one by one — the father first, young Karen last — to their deaths while the
others unknowingly cleaned up after dinner.
Lundgren shot each victim two or three times while a running chain saw
muffled the sound of the gunfire.
Lundgren argued at his trial in 1990 that he was prophet of God and
therefore not deserving of the death penalty.
‘It's not a figment of my imagination that I can in fact talk to God,
that I can hear his voice,’ he had told the jurors. ‘I am a prophet of God. I
am even more than a prophet.’”
Lundgren formed the
cult with about 20 members in the northeast Ohio town of Kirtland after he was
dismissed in 1987 as a lay minister of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter Day Saints, an offshoot of the Latter Day Saints church.
He said God commanded
him, through interpretation of Scriptures, to kill the Avery family, who had
moved from Missouri in 1987 to follow his teachings.
I found the following
three passages riveting:
- Lundgren argued at his trial in 1990 that he was prophet of God and therefore not deserving of the death penalty.
- "It's not a figment of my imagination that I can in fact talk to God, that I can hear his voice," he had told the jurors. "I am a prophet of God. I am even more than a prophet."
- He said God commanded him, through interpretation of Scriptures, to kill the Avery family, who had moved from Missouri in 1987 to follow his teachings.
Upon reflection on
those three passages, I believe we can all agree that one of the following
statements must be true. Either
- Jeffery Lundgren was stark-raving mad;
- Jeffrey Lundgren was lying about his communications with God and his status as a "prophet"; or
- Jeffrey Lundgren was telling the truth; that is, he was in intimate communication with the Almighty, he was HIS ordained prophet, and he killed the Averys on God's command.
Those are the only
choices. One must be true.
But which is it?
Frankly, unless you
are a devoted member of Mr. Lundgren's cult, I am absolutely certain that you
have not chosen #3.
Every reader in
general, and especially those who profess Christianity in particular,
has opted for either explanation #1 or #2.
# 3 is out of the
question. Dismissed. Impossible.
But why?
Atheists and
like-minded secularists have an excellent reason for their choice: If
there is no God, then #3 is not even a remote possibility. Their response
needs no further explanation.
What about those of
you who are Christians, Mormons, Jews, or Muslims however? Why do
you reject the third option? Indeed, how can you?
Your entire belief
system is based on the conviction that one or more times in the past, a Deity
communicated His wishes and instructions directly to a human or group of
humans. You are certain of this. There is no question in your mind.
But if God did
communicate with man in the past, how can you be so sure that He was not in
communication with Mr. Lundgren? Jerry Falwell claimed that God
spoke to him every day, so why not to Mr. Lundgren?
And God has, according
to the Bible, often ordered His followers to kill others, including little
children. The God of the Old Testament several times displayed an
extremely bloodthirsty and vengeful persona, so how can you know He did
not instruct Mr. Lundgren to off the Averys?
You believe that if we
all do not accept, worship, and fear this God, He will cast us into Hell and
torture us for eternity. That's pretty serious, even
vicious, stuff. Why then is it impossible to believe Mr. Lundgren
was telling the truth?
The fact is I have a
clear, concise, and rational reason for rejecting option #3.
No adherent of any
"revealed religion", including Christianity, can make the same claim.
Delusionoids can't choose #3 now, but can accept that justification for murder, in the distant past, in their book of Just So tales, because they are inconsistent. It doesn't fit in with the twisted narrative they tell themselves.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand... They can believe it's OK for "good Christian troops" to go to countries populated by "brown" Muslims and kill them today, but they can't believe it would be good for someone acting independent of a government order to kill people here for basically the same reason- a difference of opinion on superstitions.
To try to find logic, rationality, and consistency in delusionoids is going to fail.